Footprints and Forensic Podiatry
Keywords:
Footprints, Forensic PodiatryAbstract
The impressions left behind by an individual while running or walking are known as Footprints. The term Footprint is basically used for shoe print or bare footprint or series of impressions left and recovered from the floor, stairs, tables, chairs, drain pipes, mud, soil, etc. Footprints can be seen in a few sorts of cases and crime scenes like burglary, HBT (House Break-in and Theft), rapes, shoplifting, kidnapping, homicides, etc. They can be considered as important evidence encountered at many crime scenes. Footprints can reveal the actual activity of an individual at the crime scene and can also help in identifying patterns of action in the order in which they happened in spite of the absence of other documentation of the crime scene.
Footprint evidence can be classified into two types, as can numerous different kinds of forensic evidence. First is class characteristics, it includes information of general sort of footwear impression i.e. types of tread present at the base of the footwear which is usually explicit to the manufacturing brand and model of the footwear, this classification also includes person pattern of movement while walking, running, jogging, etc. as well as the size of footwear. Another is Individual characteristics, it includes wear and tears marks of the footwear if bare footprints are present different features of toes like bumps in the lines of the toe, flatfoot condition and phalange marks can be investigated. Footprints found on mud, snow dust, etc. are considered as three-dimensional or depressed or sunken foot impressions, and those found on materials like blood, ink, oil, powdery substance, etc. on the hard or smooth surface are known as two-dimensional or surface footprints. Therefore, various types of footprints are as follows latent footprints which are not visible with naked eyes, patent or visible footprints they are visible with naked eyes, and impressed foot impressions they can be seen with naked eyes as well as can be photographed.
Downloads
References
Naples, V. L., & Miller, J. S. (2004). Making tracks: The forensic analysis of footprints and footwear impressions. The Anatomical Record, 279B (1), 9–15.
Ozden et. al. (2005), Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions, Forensic Science International, 147, 181-184.
Michael Nirenberg, “Gait, Footprints, and Footwear: How Forensic Podiatry Can Identify Criminals,” The Police Chief 83 (January 2016): web only.
Lucock LJ. Identification from footwear. Chiropodist 1980; 35:343–50
Kennedy RB, Pressman IS, Chen S, Peterson PH, Pressman AE. Statistical analysis of barefoot impressions. J Forensic Sci 2003; 48:55–63
Krishan, K., Kanchan, T., & DiMaggio, J. A. (2015). Emergence of forensic podiatry—A novel sub-discipline of forensic sciences. Forensic Science International, 255, 16–2
] K. Krishan, Determination of stature from foot and its segments in a north Indian population, Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 29 (2008) 297–303.
C.M. Davies, L. Hackman, S.M. Black, The foot in forensic human identification—a review, Foot (Edinb.) 24 (2014) 31–36.
DiMaggio J., Vernon W., Forensic Podiatry: Principles and Methods, 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Jan. 2017.
Virginia LN, Jon SM. Making tracks: The forensic analysis of footprints and footwear impressions. The Anat Rec 2004;279 (B):9-15
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Chhavi Singh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© 2021 Nyayik Vigyan All Rights Reserved.